|
|
TV Antenna Recommendations for Minnesota 
Digital TV Antenna Selector.
Try our interactive digital TV antenna selector. It's easy and it's accurate!
>
Andover 55304
>
>
Hi Denny,
>
I have been looking at the Winegard SS 2000 Square Shooter to use for an tv antenna at my house. I live in zip code 55304 (Northern Twin cities area) and wonder if it would be the best for my application. I have 2 tv's I want to hook up to it, one is a Westinghouse 19" HD set and the other is 32" Magnavox analog with a dtv converter box. I would plan to mount it on my existing DirecTv dish which is wired to 2 other tv's. I don't want a big array.
>
I have not exactly figured out the right way to run the coax as the tv antenna would be on the top of my roof and one tv is in the front of the house and the other is in the back of the house. I suppose I could run 1 line down from the antenna and then use a splitter to run coax around each side of the house. If I do that, do I need something like the DA 25 and where whould it be located? I was also wondering about the Winegard MS 2000 antenna.
>
Thanks for your help.
>
Rich K ___________
>
>
Greetings Rich,
>
I examined the reception data from two sources. Your best choice for your reception conditions between the two antennas you mentioned is the SS 2000. However, the EZ-HD TV antenna is a much better choice then the SS 2000. I designed the EZ-HD antenna to be as compact as possible and yet avoid those annoying digital signal drops. When compared to the SS 2000 the EZ-HD antenna offers twice the signal gain on UHF( 14-69) and 3 times the gain on VHF (2-13). The SS 2000 is a very poor performer on VHF. Your area will have two VHF digital channels after the analog shutdown in Feb. 09. FOX KMSP currently broadcasting digitally on channel 26 will move their digital signal to their vacated channel 9 position and NBC KARE currently broadcasting on 35 will do the same and move back to channel 11. With this in mind I would certainly recommend the EZ-HD antenna. >
The antenna can be installed in a fixed position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing South/Southeast. This position will provide excellent reception on all of the Minneapolis/St. Paul stations.
>
To supply both TV locations I suggest you run from the antenna to a 2 way signal splitter and then to each TV. Set it up so the cable run to each TV is as short as possible. The EZ-HD antenna has extremely high signal gain for its size. I doubt you will need any amplification especially if you use = quality solid copper RG 6 coax cable. If by chance you do need amplification it can always be easily added. >
I hope the EZ-HD antenna meets your size requirements, it is your best choice for performance.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
>
Austin 55912
>
>
What is best antenna setup for in Austin MN 55912?
Longitude: 43.669538-N, Latitude: 92.978374-W
Challenging circumstances:
a) 4 towers within 30 miles,
two easterly 20-30 mi, -- 103 & 158 degrees
two westerly 1 & 10 mi. -- 247 & 271 degrees
b) multiple trees adjacent to both E & W sides of 2-story house,
10' or more taller than highest roof line
c) 3 TVs (all analog now) basement, 1st floor, 2nd floor
d) currently on satellite with thunderstorm-caused interruptions
due to more tall oaks nearly blocking the line of sight for rooftop dish
OK in winter, so probably leafless trees allow sufficient signal
e) this is a private residence with pretty large lot, so various mounting
schemes can be tried
f) house previously had cable installation, so there is plenty of good coax
Brian
PS, I worked a long time in computer networking so I am not unfamiliar with
engineering trade-offs. I can pretty much do any installation except climbing
to a 30' roof top.
>
>
Greetings Brian,
>
It's not all that challenging. First, because of the nearby PBS station (1.5 miles) the MS 2000 omni-directional antenna is out of the question. The built-in preamplifier is almost certain to overload. The other thing worth mentioning is that antenna elevation is not crucial at your location since line of site to all transmitting antennas is 3.6 feet above ground or less. What's more important is locating the antenna system where there will be the least amount of obstructions in the path to the transmitters.
Your best option for consistent quality reception is utilizing two antennas. The best choice here would be the miniMAX TV antenna. This small sized antenna provides signal gain of antennas much larger and you'll also appreciate the quality of construction. > Install one antenna with the narrow end pointing at approximately 250 degrees. Install the other pointing at approximately 130 degrees. Some minor adjustment in direction may be required at the time of installation. The miniMAX II antenna has a receiving beam width of 44 degrees. The antenna pointing at 130 degrees may not provide absolute picture perfect reception on all analog stations in that directions, but they will come in very good. On the other hand the digital/HD reception should be perfect. The only other choice is a single antenna and a rotor and I don't think you want a rotor especially with multiple TV's connected to the system.
Couple the two antennas together using the mast mounted CC 7870 antenna coupler. On the CC 7870 output use the mast mounted AP 8700 antenna preamplifier. This preamplifier should provide enough signal amplification for the entire system. >The system set up would go like this. With the two antennas mounted run two short pieces of coax cable from the outputs of each antenna to the coupler inputs. From the coupler output run a short cable to the preamplifier input. From the preamplifier output run cable to the location where it will enter your home. At this location a ground block should be installed and a ground wire ran from the block to a suitable ground. Next run cable from the ground block indoors to the preamplifier power supply that's included with the AP 8700. The power supply requires an electrical outlet and will supply low voltage electricity via the coax cable to the preamplifier. From the power supply run cable to the signal splitter and from there to the TV's. If your outdoor connections are not made using water tight fittings such as lock and seal compression connectors I suggest that you use a dielectric grease such as Stuff waterproofing filler. A ground wire should also be ran from the antenna mount/mast to a suitable ground.
I don't believe any additional amplification will be required. However, you can test this by running from the power supply directly to one TV leaving the signal splitter out of the system. If the signal degrades when the splitter is in place a distribution amplifier such as the DA 25 can improve the reception to the quality level experience when the splitter was removed from the system. >I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both analog and digital/HD signals.
If you would like detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in any way, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>
>
Brook Park 55007
>
>
We currently have "dish" satellite & a VHF antenna for our local channels. I want to replace it with a VHF/UHF. ZIP code is 55007. We live on a hill & the antenna is above the second story of our home. We currently do not have an amplifier or rotor & get excellent reception. Which antenna do you recommend?
Thanks,
Bob
>
Greetings Bob,
>
Your location does not require a rotor, most of your stations are from Minneapolis/St. Paul at 187 degrees at a distance of just over 60 miles. I recommend the Winegard HD 7080P VHF/UHF digital ready TV antenna. Because of the characteristics of UHF signal I highly recommend the AP 8700 antenna preamplifier. UHF signal can have up to 3 times as much signal loss as VHF as it travels the distance from your antenna to your TV. A preamplifier can compensate for this loss resulting in much better picture quality The combination of these two items properly installed will provide excellent results at your location. If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source. >
>Duluth 55803
>
>
I live in Duluth, Mn. ..zip 55803.have direct tv ....about 25 miles from towers that deliver local signals..can I use the outdoor square shooter? Do I need a pre amp? Will splitting it into the direct tv line reduce the quality of the picture?? I will have it hooked into only one tv.an HD ready 42" Sony LCD..I was hoping I would not have to run another wire through cement foundation and 40 ft of crawl space. ..or would the Rotorless ms 2000 be a better option where I could mount it on the peak of the roof??
>
>
Greetings Jerry,
2. The number of TV locations that will receive TV signals from the antenna.
We only use 1 right now but I want to use 3 TV's
>
3. Will you be using the antenna for analog reception until the analog signals are turned off or just
digital/HD reception ? Yes, analog until turned off
>
4. Do you intend to use the TV antenna outside or in your attic Etc...
I didn't know you could actually put an antenna INSIDE your attic. It certainly would be safer there. We have high winds here at times (40-50 mph on a fairly regular basis and up to 70 mph periodically). I had originally planned to put it on the roof. What would be your suggestion?
>
5. Also include any additional information that you feel =ertains to your particular reception conditions.
The house is in a clearing, we sit below the ridge but are still in line with the TV station antenna's. Station antenna's are on the top of the ridge with no large hills in-between us.
>
We get good reception with an indoor UHF/VHF antenna we bought 4 years ago when we bought our first HD TV, I'm just tired of moving it around when changing to certain stations.
>
Appreciate any suggestions you might give me.
Karen L _________
>
>
Greetings Karen,
>
I have the perfect antenna for you. It's called the EZ-HD TV antenna. It's compact, well built, easy to install, and inexpensive. The antenna comes alone or can be purchased as a complete package. You won't need any amplification to supply signal to 1 TV. However, if you add a signal splitter for multiple TV's a distribution amplifier such as the DA 25 distribution amplifier installed just ahead of the signal splitter on the antenna side will likely be required for the best results. >
The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing Southwest. This position will provide you with great reception on all of the Duluth station without the need for adjustment.
>
Antennas usually work best located outside and the EZ-HD antenna is well built and can withstand very strong winds. However, if your attic is free of brick, foiled faced insulation, aluminum siding etc... in the Southwest direction to the transmitters there is a very good chance it would work well there. You may want to try it in the attic and only go outside if it fails to produce satisfactory results.
>
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both analog and digital/HD signals.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
>
Both ABC WDIO and PBS WDSE will return to the VHF band in February at the time of the analog shutdown. The Square Shooter is a poor performer on VHF. Your perfect choice for consistent quality digital reception is the EZ-HD TV antenna. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing South. >
You can combine the satellite signal and the TV antenna signal to the same down lead if... your satellite receiver isn't high definition, it's called diplexing. If it is an HDTV satellite receiver it won't work. Also, if you combine the two together I recommend the AP 8700 mast mounted preamplifier. If you run a separate cable for the antenna and do not use a signal splitter or diplexer a preamplifier will not be necessary. >
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
>
>
Duluth 55804
>
>
1. The street address, including the zip code of where the TV antenna is to be installed.
____________ Rd, 55804
>
Denny,
Enjoyed the article on your car. If more people did what your doing maybe the outrages price of new cars would come down. I need a new antenna, but I am not sure which one I need. I live at 55810 zip code. All stations are the same direction, within 4 degrees of each other, and only 9 to 9.5 miles away. I am surrounded by tall trees, but I have a 2 story house I can mount on top of. I also have high voltage transmission lines about 1000 ft away, and another set about a 1/2 mile away but between me and the broadcast towers. What do you think?
Thanks for your assistance,
Greg
>
>
Greetings Greg,
>
The car is still going and running fine. As long as it runs good I will keep driving it.
I would recommend the Winegard HD 7082 antenna without an preamplifier. Even with the trees the 7082 will deliver a quality signal without an amp. I think an amplifier may only enhance any electrical interference from the power lines. Channel 3 is the most likely to show electrical sparkling lines on the screen. The 7082 is very directive so any electrical radiation from a cracked insulator etc. would have to be directly in front of you and not off to the sides. If I can assist you further Greg, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
>
>
Farmington 55024
>
>
First of all I would like to say you have an excellent and very informative site. Great Job.
>
I would like your recommendation on an antenna setup I could =se. I currently have DirecTV on four
televisions and basic cable on another four. I would like =o get rid of the basic cable and have Digital / HD
reception on three TV's. All of the TV's currently on basic =able all connect to one 8 way
splitter (one in eight out). I would like to install an =ntenna in the attic, but could install a small one outside
near my dish on the roof. I live in a one story rambler, =owever, we are located on the highest point in Dakota County MN.
North of the house one the other side of the street is a hill =2-3 stories high) , but other than that no large trees or buildings.
>
My address is
__________ Way
Farmington, MN 55024
Thanks
Craig P ________>
>
Greetings Craig,
>
I examined the reception data from two separate sources and found =hat the EZ-HD TV antenna to be a perfect match for your location. To supply all 3 TV locations you will need proper amplification. The data shows the signals to be quite strong so I wouldn't suggest a preamplifier for fear the stronger signals would overdrive the unit. Your best bet is the HDA 100 distribution amplifier installed ahead of the signal splitter on the antenna side no closer then a 20 foot coax cable length from the antenna and no further then 50 feet. >The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing North. The hill you mentioned may have some effect on the signal but the signals appear strong enough that the effect will go unnoticed. Attic installation work fine most of the time. However, there are occasion that for whatever reason the results are poor and the antenna must be installed outside. If it were me I would temporarily install the EZ-HD in the attic, point it North, drop a cable line down to the nearest TV and check it out. A single line of 50 feet or less will not require any amplification so you can just connect directly to the TV. If the reception is good then install everything in a more permanent manner with the amplifier and splitter etc... If the reception is not satisfactory install it outside and test it in the same manner with the single cable running to the TV.
>
I'm fairly certain that the attic installation will work fine but it's always good to test it first. Also, just a few feet one way or another can make a big difference with attic installations.
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both analog and digital/HD signals.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to =nstall the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards, Denny Duplessis TV Antenna Source >
>
Minneaoplis TV Stations A guide to Minneapolis free TV stations. Availability, reception maps, tv antenna
type, programming schedule and much more...>
>
>
Minneapolis 55406
>
>
I live in south Minneapolis and need something to =mprove reception.My zip is 55406.
>
Also, I'm thinking of getting the =P-7 for my dad up in Moose Lake, zip 55767.
All the channels are or =ill be above 7.It's about 40 miles from Duluth, where they come from. Would =hat be a good choice? If so, what's a good mount to use.
>
>
Greetings Alan,
>
>
>
Unlike the EZ-HD that can be mounted on a J-pole the HD 7697P will take a little larger more stable mount. The best choices are the 5 foot tripod, the 5 foot sloped roof mount, or the eave mount. Any of these mounts would work great for the HD 7697. The 5 foot tripod and the eave mount require a mast pipe the sloped roof mount does not.
>
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both =nalog and digital/HD signals.
>
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
>
>
Minneapolis, MN 55418
>
>
1 . I live at _____________ Road, Minneapolis, MN 55418-2437.
2. I have four TVs with rabbit ears. I have just purchased one digital HDTV which I have connected to a public access cable line which gives me free access to local information stations. I do not pay for that service and I access it through an "A/B box" which I gather will no longer be useful next February.
3. I am using the rabbit ears for analog reception
4. I want to have a roof tv antenna and I have finally convinced the man who would put it up for me that this is a good idea.
>
I have also purchased two of the government subsidized converter boxes. I got the Zenith model which I learned (the hard way) does not provide current pass through capabilities for the analog channels. I am keeping these on the shelf until February as I realize that if I return them, the stores keep the $80 federal subsidizing monies. I am thinking of purchasing another digital HDTV and using just the two other TVs with the converter boxes.
>
I have a house with a brick front and masonry board. I think that I want to purchase your Winnegard SS 2000 TV antenna. I understand that then I would not need interior antennas if the outdoor antenna could be wired to the four TVs I have. I want them to be wired on the inside of the house so that I don't have more than one hole in my house from the public access cable instillation.
>
We called and talked to a knowledgeable woman on Monday at your place and she said I'd need an amplifier of some kind. The workman thinks I will not need to have additional cable beyond the 50 feet and he can substitute" other cable. Also I wonder what is needed to ground the cable.
>
Thank you for your help! It is really confusing time.
>
>
Greetings Corinna,
>
I examined the reception data from two sources. Although the MS 2000 antenna may work it wouldn't be my first choice. The absolute best choice is the EZ-HD TV antenna. This antenna is quite small in size yet offers extremely good performance. The antenna can be installed in a fixed position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing Northeast at approximately 60 degrees on the compass. This position will provide you with great reception on all of the Minneapolis/St Paul analog and digital channels. >
You will need amplification. Your best choice here is DA 25 distribution amplifier. Install this unit ahead of the signal splitter on the antenna side. >
>
When the antenna is installed I would go ahead and use your digital tuners. All of your area stations now have a digital signal so you won't miss a thing when compared to analog. As a matter of fact you will get more channels digitally then you will with analog reception.
>
Don't let this whole thing confuse you. I'm certain properly installed this system will provide you with excellent reception. I'm here to advise you if you need it.
>
If I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact =e.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
>
>
Rochester 55939
>
>
Hi,
I live on a farm South of Rochester, MN on the Iowa line. We have direct TV service which is great but, local reception is good and bad, I just bought a Samsung 27 Slim fit for our parlor on the East side of our home. Got a rabbit ear and the reception is worse than it was from the set it replaced. I have another 27" up stairs with ears (South room) ears... good
reception and two more sets. one 27" in front room (good reception) and a little 13" upstairs (the best reception with rabbit ears.NE room). We have a 1,000' tower West of us 22 miles. Channel 10 and PBS 24 Iowa are off that tower. Channel 6 Austin 50 miles West, Channels 8 and 19 LaCrosse, Wi 60 mi East, Channel 3 Mason City 85 miles SW. So, I get all of these channels with varying degrees of reception. The little 13" is the best on second floor. All come in pretty good. 10 & 24 are the best but my new Slim Fit is not good with the ears I bought yesterday. What do you think and can I hook up all sets to one antenna? We are up high in this area.
Jeff,
SE, MN
>
>
Jeff,
>
The sure bet is an HD 7082P TV antenna along with a AP 8700 antenna preamplifier and a antenna rotor. This combination would absolutely provide great TV reception on all of your local channels you mentioned and then some. However I believe a good chance exist that the MS 2000 omnidirectional TV antennawould also provide good results. The advantages to the MS 2000 are numerous. Its relatively inexpensive, its easy to install, it looks good and does not require rotation to receive stations in different directions. I believe if you installed the MS 2000 above your highest roof line you would get very good results. Either antenna may be hooked up to all of your TV's using a signal splitter and running coax cable to each location. If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
Denny
View our TV antenna guarantee>
>Shoreview 55126>
>I am exactly 1 mile south of the Shoreview towers. I would be using the antenna for a TV in the lower level of a walk out style house with the hill between the TV and the towers. I also have a forest of trees north of me. I'm guessing I don't want amplified but I also know that mere rabbit ears don't work. Do I need an external antenna?
I've heard that after the transition some of the local stations will go back to their current channels so I'm guessing I need a VHF/UHF TV antenna.
>
Thanks,
John
>
>
Hi John, > I need a little more information so I can provide you with a reliable recommendation. Could you please provide me with the info. requested on this page: http://www.dennysantennaservice.com/antennn=_recommendation.html > Thanks, Denny >
>_________ Lane
Shoreview, MN 55126
>
Inside only
>
Digital/HD No analog
>
One TV only
>
Thanks,
John>
>
Hi John,
>
I examined the reception conditions at your location and to be truthful there are some issues. As you mentioned the transmitters are very close. Most of the transmitters are to the Northwest. However, FOX, MNT, and PBS are Northeast. There is about a 32 degree spread between the transmitters. I doubt that we're gonna get an indoor TV antenna to provide consistent digital reception. If we do it will likely require adjustment when you change channels and probably won't work well in bad weather.
>
I know you said inside antenna only but it's unlikely you will get satisfactory reception with an indoor antenna. Especiallywith the antenna located the lower level of your home. If you have to go with an indoor antenna I suggest the SS 3000 Sharp Shooter. This antenna is designed for strong signal areas where multi-path (bouncing signals) is likely to be present. Your location is likely to have multi-path interference. If this antenna does work you will may have to adjust its position on various channels. >
Your best bet is the EZ-HD TV antenna. I designed this antenna to be effective on channels 7 and up. This allows the antenna to be compact and yet offer outstanding performance. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing North. If the coax cable run from the antenna to the TV will be 75 feet or less I wouldn't recommend a preamplifier. >
You have two channels in your area that will return to VHF at the time of the analog shutdown in Feb. of 09. Channel 9 FOX will move their digital signal to their analog vacated channel 9 position and NBC 11 will do the same and broadcast digitally on 11.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV">
>
St. Paul 55104
>
>
Hi Denny - My name is Pat Shrake and I'm interested in purchasing an antenna. Our television is now in the southeast corner of the basement of our old stucco house, and when I hooked up a digital converter to my TV, I essentially get no reception with my ancient TV top antenna. Analog is working fairly well on the higher VHF stations (9 & 11), but not when I use digital.
>
I'm thinking the Winegard MS 2000 is right based on your website, but I'm not certain and have a few questions.
>
First, my address is 2114 Marshall Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55104. My 2 story house is on the south side of the street, and the north side of the street is partway up a hill, with the hill eventually being taller than my house (~25 feet) about 100 yards north. Of course, there are large two story houses to my north on top of the hill - they are about 100 feet away.
>
Most of the stations are fairly close (8 miles) and slightly east of north (16 to 22 degrees). However, a very important station to us (K19ER) broadcasts from on top of the IDS tower 4.5 miles away to the northwest (295 degrees). I think their analog signal will continue and I hope they will have a digital signal. I don't want a rotor, so that is why I am thinking of the MS 2000.
>
I have a flat roofed house with a 3 foot high (very solid) parapet wall on it. I'm thinking it will be relatively easy to attach a short antenna mast to the northwest corner of the parapet wall with wall mounts (any suggestions appreciated), but from there I have a lot of questions.
>
I really prefer not to drill a hole through the roof, so I am planning to run the cable over the edge and then have the choice of running it all the way down my house to a power source in the basement (approx. 40 feet from the antenna). If I do that, I would then have about 40 feet more run to my television. Alternatively, I could run the cable all the way to the television (approximately 80 feet). If I have to, I could run the cable to a power source on the second floor about 20 feet from the antenna. I then would probably run the cable back out of the house and about 60 feet to the television. I'm not sure if the first option will work - is it ok to have the power source 40 feet from the antenna? 80 feet? For that matter, would it be ok to have the power source as much as 20 feet from the antenna?
>
My big concern is about grounding the antenna. Because my roof is flat with a 3 foot overhang, I'm concerned about running a ground wire over the edge and then turning 180 degrees to get the wire down the side of the house. Is this a problem? If not, I then am concerned that I have a concrete sidewalk on the side at the base of the house. I could run the ground wire about 15 feet diagonally along the side of the house to the front and sink a ground pole. Would all this turning be a problem?
>
If you think this all would work, could you recommend everything I would need for a self-install?
>
I really appreciate your assistance.
>
Thanks
Pat S.>
>
>
Greetings Pat,
>
I examined the reception data and have to say your not in a good location for the MS 2000 antenna. The MS 2000 like all omni-directional antennas is susceptible to signal overload and multi-path interference. Your location because of the close proximity to the transmitters has both of these issues.
>
Your best bet is the EZ-HD TV antenna with the narrower end of the antenna pointing North/Northeast. This will provide you with excellent reception on all the major stations. If channel 19 does not come in well with the antenna in this position turn it West/Northwest. I think all of the major stations digital signals will come in fine with the antenna in this position. Along with the antenna I suggest the high signal input HDP 269 mast mounted preamplifier. This unit will help insure that the major digital signals will come in no matter what direction the antenna is pointing. >
The worst scenario would be to point the EZ-HD antenna at the major transmitters and couple a 4221 UHF antenna pointing at channel 19. I don't believe you'll have to do this. I believe you'll find that reception is great pointing the EZ-HD at channel 19, using the HDP 269 preamplifier and getting the major station signals off from the side of the antenna. >
I wish I could just say that the MS 2000 would work but I'm almost certain it won't.
>
As far as grounding goes the shorter and more direct the wire can be the better but you have to work with what you have. If you have to run it around here and there to install it it's definitely better then no ground at all.
>
The distance the preamplifier power injector is from the mast mounted preamplifier will make no difference unless you surpass 250 feet. Its only purpose is to supply low voltage power up the coax cable to power the preamplifier. Winegard preamplifier's are designed to operate at 100% with a voltage from 10 to 18 volts. The power injector supplies 18 volts to the coax cable so a voltage loss of to 8 volts can occur as it travels the cable and still maintain 100% efficiency. Using RG 6 coax cable 8 volt loss occurs...you guessed it... at 250 feet. RG 59 cable is about 200 feet.
>
If I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Product Status - In Stock
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
>
>
Zimmerman 55398
>
>
Denny,
We live 45 miles NW of Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN. Our zipcode is 55398. We live in the woods on a hill. Right now we have a 25 year old antenna in our attic. Some stations are fair but others are snowy and others don't come in at all (broadcast stations). We were wondering what kind of antenna we could mount on top of our roof to get us good reception. We have one HD-ready TV and one that isn't. Thank you for your help.
- David
>
>
Greetings David, >Your TV transmitters are all in the same direction at 140 degrees Southwest at approximately 35 miles. Minneapolis/St. Paul broadcast market has a channel 2, 4 and 5. Because of the characteristics of these channel frequencies a compact antenna would not be a good choice. I recommend the Winegard HD 7080P VHF/UHF/Digital TV antenna along with an AP 8700 antenna preamplifier. This combination will provide excellent results both for your digital TV antenna reception and analog. Your location does not require an antenna rotor since all stations are in the same direction. >If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source
|
|
|
|
