Bluffton 46714
>
Hi Denny, I was looking forthe best possible Indoor TV Antenna and stumbled across your Web Site. As I was reading your site I was impressed. So I was wondering if you could help me with the best possible indoor antenna for my application. What I want to do is replace a antenna in my attic with a better one. I am going to run rg6 coax cable.I live in Indiana zip of 46714 2 story house with no immediate obstructions in the way. I want to got to my television and also split off to three other televisions, please help me install this properly for the best reception. Of course I want to do this right for the future of digital. I hope this makes sense Thanks Randy
P.S. I was looking at your MS2000
>
Greetings Randy,
>
All of your networks are available from Fort Wayne due North at a distance of about 25 miles. They all broadcast on the UHF (14-69) band and they will continue to do so after the digital transition is complete in 2009. As far as digital TV antenna reception goes, in a nutshell, a TV antenna that performs good receiving current analog broadcasts will work just as well fordigital/HD reception. Digital signals are and will broadcast on the same frequency bands as current analog signal, requiring the same type of antennas to receive the signal.
>
You do have a few channels within range of your location in other directions however, they are duplicate networks as those available from Fort Wayne. My suggestion for an attic installation would be the Channel master 4221 UHF TV antenna along with an Winegard AP 4700 antenna preamplifier. I'm confident that this combination would provide excellent results for you. If you want to receive those channels that I mention from other various directions I would recommend a rotor to turn the antenna. I am a little hesitant to recommend the MS 2000 TV antenna for an attic installation at your location. However, if you would like to try it we do offer a 100% money back guarantee. I'm not saying the MS 2000 won't work but rather I'm not confident enough to recommend it in the attic at your location.
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
>
>
Charlestown 47111
>
>
I live in zip code 47111 with an older outside antenna that the recent storm just tore to bits. I know my locals are close by and even with the older antenna I was able to pick them up quite well for the most part but I would like to purchase an antenna or set up a system that would not only receive my locals HD and analog at this time, but also Bloomington stations as well if possible.
>
>
Greetings
>
Unfortunately the Bloomingtondigital signals are very weak and will likely be difficult to be consistently received with any antenna so I can't really make a recommendation for those stations. However, to receive the Louisville area digital stations the EZ-HD TV antenna is a great choice. Along with the antenna I suggest the
AP 8700 mast mounted preamplifier. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing South/Southwesterly.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
>
>
Crown Point 46307
>
Crown Point 46307 post digital transition update
On June 12, 2009 all Chicago stations began broadcasting on channel frequencies of 7 and higher. The smaller, less expensive EZ HD antenna is now the antenna recommendation for this whole area South of Chicago. The minimaxantenna as recommended below will still work but the antennas wider width (93") is no longer needed to receive the Chicago area stations.
>
>
Hi - We live an an area of NW Indiana that gets bad reception for the local Chicago VHF (espec) and some UHF channels. We really hate the idea of shelling out good $$$ for "basic" cable or disk service when the the "basic" package "basically" just brings in the FREE channels without the fuzz.
We have thought about trying the Philips outdoor Mant-950 antenna, but then I'd have to snake some cable some how to get to the TV. We'd prefer an indoor. We have an RCA model now that does "ok" but could really be improved on.
We have been exploring the Philips High Performance Amplified Indoor Uhf/Vhf/Fm/HDTV Antenna and the Radio Shack Indoor Antenna 15-1892. Research shows some positive postings on both. Tried a Terk. It sucked.
Are you familiar with either the Philips or RS items? In general, are we just wasting our time trying to sovle this problem from inside the house?
Thanks in advance for any response.
J. _______
>
>
Greetings,
>
The fact is most indoor antennas perform about the same. Some may perform a little better then others but yes, it does sound like you may be wasting your time with indoor antennas.
It's difficult for me to offer you a recommendation without having your street address and zip code.
If I can assist you further, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source
>
Thanks Dennis for your comments. Our zip code is 46307. Is there an outdoor antenna you can recommend? Does the disk or stick type work for both UHF and VHF?
J. ________
>
>
Your absolute best bet for excellent analog and digital/HD reception at your location is the miniMAX T
V antenna along with the Winegard HDP 269 antenna preamplifier. We have customer's using this combination all around the Chicago area withgreat success. Small compact antennas are not a good choice for Chicago reception due to the longer wavelengths of channel 2 and 5. To capture these wavelengths properly requires a wider antenna. The wavelength of channel 2 is 102" making it very difficult to receive with a smaller compact antenna. The miniMAX is designed for good signal gain all the way down to channel 2. As a matter of fact there is a gentleman in Elgin with this set up who has a comment at the bottom of the miniMAX photo gallery page.
>
The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrow end pointing NNW to receive all of the Chicago area stations.
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both analog and digital/HD signals.
>
UPDATE:
The above recommendation was made about 4 years ago. Since that time the EZ HD antenna has been designed and is now on the market. My recommendation now would be for the EZ HD antenna. See the EZ HD antenna
>
If you would like detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in any way, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>
>
Elberfeld 47613>>
>
>
Hi, I found your web site and noticed that you would recommend an antenna. We are interested in the local (ABC, FOX, NBC, CBS) channels in HDTV only. We currently have a Dish Network satellite service, but the local channels are poor quality on their service. Listed below is our current information.
address: _________ Rd
Elberfeld, IN 47613
>
>
Greetings Charles,
>
The absolute best choice for consistent quality digital/HD reception for your location is the UP-7 antenna or the
EZ HD TV antenna. These antenna are designed to receive channels 7 and above allowing the to be much smaller and yet provide the signal gain of antennas 3 or 4 times larger. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrow end pointing South Southwest. All of your digital stations are currently broadcasting on the UHF band. I know you didn't mention that you wanted PBS but they are moving their digital signal to channel 9 at the time of the analog shutdown. The price of the UP-7 or the EZ HD is no more then an applicable UHF only antenna so why eliminate PBS, just in case.
Along with the antenna I suggest the Winegard HDP 269 antenna preamplifier.
>
If there are no signal blocking materials in your attic such as aluminum siding, foil faced insulation. brick etc... in the path to the transmitters I believe the antenna can be installed in your attic with excellent results.
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent digital/HD reception.
>
If you would like detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in any way, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>
>
Edinburgh 46124
Denny,
We are impressed with your website and obvious knowledge, but we’re still not quite certain which TV antenna would be best for our setting. We live on a farm surrounded by several hundred acres of flat, open ground. We are approximately 40 miles south of Indianapolis. Do you have any recommendations?
Is the only distinction between the MS2000 and MS2002 that one comes with 50 feet of coaxial cable?Thanks so much for your time and input! We appreciate your effort.
Take care,
Hal & Cindy
>
>
Greetings Hal & Cindy,
>
I just finished viewing the channel data from your location. I think the Winegard MS 2000 TV antenna should be a good choice for your location. I do have one small concern that I must mention. You have 3 channels within 11 miles of your location, 4, 42 and 63. These channels because of their close proximity could cause a signal overload, meaning to much signal and causing reception problems. I think the chance of this happening is slight but possible. Because your stations are in different directions the only alternative would be a larger TV antenna requiring a rotor. If it were me I would certainly go with the MS 2000 and if by chance it does overload you can always take advantage of our 100% money back guarantee.
>
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
>
>
Elkhart 46514
>
>
I live in the zip code of 46514. Most of the stations in my area are within 15 miles of my house. All come in pretty clear already but two of them are a bit fuzzy. I just bought an HD compatible TV and am wondering if I need a new antenna. Reading some of your articles I'm beginning to think that my old one will do just fine. I've attached a picture of it. Do you think it's OK?
>
>
The antenna in the picture is a Channel Master 4221 UHF antenna. All of your current analog and digital/HDTV are UHF and will remain that way even after the analog shutdown in 2009. The antenna will work just fine now and in the future. You mentioned a couple of fuzzy channels. You can cure that if you wish with a Winegard AP 4700 preamplifier. UHF signal is more susceptible to signal loss traveling the coax cable than VHF using a preamplifier will remedy that issue. If your new TV receives these channels they will be crystal clear. If those channels freeze up and little squares come and go in the picture the preamplifier will solve the problem.
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
Evansville 47712
>
>
Denny,
I have recently moved to Evansville Indiana and am looking to get an
antenna to pick up the digital television signals in the area.
I have reviewed the antenna's on your website, but am torn between the
EZ HD antenna and the MS2000 for my area. Most signals are located
within 70degrees, although a station from Illinois is located in the
opposite direction of most stations.
Our address is _________________ Road, Zip is 47712. I will be hooking
up 2 HDTV's to the antenna. I am planning on using the antenna for
digital/HD reception only.
I have room in the attic for installation, but would place the antenna
outside on the roof for better reception. The attic has
plywood/ashphalt shingles so I don't expect a lot of interference.
Our house is 1.5 stories and is located on a bluff with several large
trees to the west of the house (away from most signal locations).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Aaron
>
>
Greetings Aaron,
>
I suggest the
EZ-HD TV antenna with the narrower end of the antenna pointing East/Southeast. According to the reception data the IL. station signal you mentioned is very weak and would require a large directional antenna and a rotor to receive it consistently.
>
>
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent digital reception rain or shine.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>
>
Fort Wayne 46815
>
>
Dear Denny,
1. I live at: _____________ Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46815.
2. One TV
3. Antenna will be for digital only. I doubt there will be any analog in my area.
4. At the present time, I have a double bay antenna hanging up in the attic. I would like to leave it hanging there, but I could put it up on the roof if I need to.
5. I'm only 6 or 7 miles from the TV towers. BUT, the house is on the back side of a small hill. The hill is inbetween me and the towers. After checking a topographic map, the hill rises about 25 feet above the house. Also, standing on the roof and looking in the direction of the towers, there are plenty of large trees in the way, pretty much, a forest.
That's all I guess. Thanks,
Gary K
>
>
Greetings Gary,
>
I examined the reception data and the perfect choice for your location is the EZ-HD TV antenna. This antenna offers a very high signal gain for its size and should do well under your conditions. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end pointing West. If the coax cable run from the antenna to the TV is 75 feet or less and a signal splitter will not be used a preamplifier should not be necessary.
>
I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent digital/HD reception.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>
>
Good morning Denny,
>
>
I live in Indianapolis 46201 and would like to set up an antenna and get rid of cable. There are a few trees in the area but no tall buildings. I will use the antenna for 1 TV but may hook up 1 or 2 more later. I've heard there are more free channels now and the picture can be received in high definition.
>
Thanks in advance - Bruce K.
>
>
Good afternoon Bruce,
>
That's true, there are more free channels now and they can be viewed in HD with an HDTV set. Not all shows are provided in HDTV format. You'll find older shows (reruns) that were not recorded in HD to have a good quality digital picture but not quit as good as the newer shows that are HDTV format.
>
I took a look at the data and found that the EZ HD antennais an excellent choice for your area. The antenna can be installed with the narrower end aiming North/Northwest. To supply 1 TV with a coax cable run from the antenna to the TV of 75 feet or less signal amplification should not be required. However, in the future if you do add a signal splitter to supply multiple TV's I suggest the HDA 100 distributionamplifier installed on the antenna side of the signal splitter. In other words the coax down lead from the antenna would go to the HDA 100 and then to the splitter.
>
If you need anything else just let me know.
>
Take care,
Denny
>
.
>
Odon
>
>
Is the winegard antenna better made than the Radio shack antennas and how much better is the 7082 than 7080. I need a antenna and am trying to get one that would pull in Indianapolis which is 80+ miles. I am south of there around Odon In, the rest we get is Terre Haute, Evansville, and some at Vincennes.
Thanks
Roy
>
>
>
UPDATE:
The above recommendation was made about 3 years ago. Since that time the HD Stacker antenna has been designed and is now on the market. My recommendation now would be for the HD Stacker antenna. See the HD Stacker antenna
>
Winegard antennas are built better and perform at least as good or better than Radio Shack antennas, as a matter of fact our local Radio Shack dealer carries Winegard antenna. We live in open country and the Radio Shack antennas won't hold up to the wind. Read a true story about Winegard and Radio Shack antennas.
Denny
>
>
Saint John 46373
>
Hi Denny,
>
I live at ________Drummond Ave just off from Joiliet St. in St. John, IN. 46373. What antenna is best for my location. The antenna will feed 3 Televisions. I plan to mount the antenna outdoors. I like the looks and size of the ez hd will it work for me?
>
Thanks, Mel
>
>
Hi Mel,
>
The EZ HD antenna is an excellent choice for your location. As a matter of fact it's a great choice for all areas in Northern IN. North of Hwy. 10 and East of Hwy. 49. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrower end of the antenna aiming North/Northwest at about 346 degrees on the compass.
To feed the 3 TV locations I recommend the HDA 100 amplifier. Install this unit on the coax cable down lead from the antenna within a 50 foot cable length from the antenna before the signal splitter on the antenna side of the splitter.
Denny
>
>
Schererville 46375
>
>>
Denny,
I live in Schererville, IN exactly 30 miles from Chicago's Sears Tower and Hancock Tower. I am ready to switch to a satellite TV system but want to have local (VHF and UHF) reception (from Chicago) for 4 of my TV sets. I live in a 2 story town home and can mount the MS2000 on my roof or chimney. Do you think I will have decent reception for channels 2-13 and UHF? What additional materials will I need to mount the MS2000. Thanks.
Arthur
>
>
Greetings Arthur,
>
The kind of mount is your choice. View the antenna mounts and try to determine which mount will work best for your structure and you can safely install. The MS 2000 mounts to a standard 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 OD mast pipe.
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source
>
>
Solsberry 47459
>
>
Hey Denny. I live at ________ in Solsberry,Indiana 47459. What
directional antenna would you recommend to recieve OTA HDTV from Terre
Haute(40 mi.),Bloomington(12 MI.),and Indianapolis(60 mi.) I would also like
a recommendation for a rotator. Thanks Sam
>
>
Greetings Sam,
>
I took a look at the channels available in your area. I recommend the Winegard HD 7082P TV antenna along with an AP 8700 antenna preamplifier. The best rotor available is the Channel Master 9521 TV antenna rotor.You could use the smaller HD 7080 except for channel 6 ABC WRTV in Indianapolis, it apparently has a weaker signal than the rest of the channels from that location and would require the HD 7082 for best results. I believe the above recommendation would provide excellent results at your location.
>
UPDATE:
The above recommendation was made about 3 years ago. Since that time the HD Stacker antenna has been designed and is now on the market. My recommendation now would be for the HD Stacker antenna. See the HD Stacker antenna
>
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
Denny
>
>
Springville 47462
>
>
Hi,
I need an HDTV antenna to receive Indianapolis stations. I think I need VHF and UHF capabilities. I live in Springville, IN zip 47462 and I am also in a hole.
thanks
>
>
Greetings,
>
You are absolutely correct you have 5 channels within range of your location that either are or will broadcast on VHF with the rest being UHF.
Considering the Indianapolis transmitters are about 70 miles from your location and you mentioned you live in a hole, I recommend the Winegard HD 7084P TV antenna. With the distance and elevation issues there is no sense in messing around with anything less. I also recommend an AP 8700 antenna preamplifier (booster) along with the antenna. All of the Indianapolis channels are in the same direction. There are several other stations available in different directions. If you want to receive them you may want to add a antenna rotor so you may turn the antenna for best results. Since the Indianapolis channels are all in the same direction a rotor would not be necessary to receive them, along with a few other channels that would probably come in.
>
UPDATE:
The above recommendation was made about 3 years ago. Since that time the HD Stacker antenna has been designed and is now on the market. My recommendation now would be for the HD Stacker antenna. See the HD Stacker antenna
.
>
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source
>
>
Since I am in a hole do I not necessarily have to be in the line of sight?
>
TV signal is received best when there is a line of sight from the transmitter antenna and the receiving antenna. However, this does not mean that if you have poor line of sight reception is not possible. What is does mean is it is more difficult. I recommended the HD 7084P antenna because that is one of the best long range antennas available. In a nutshell, if it can't do it no other consumer available antenna will. At your location I honestly can't say with absolute certainty that you will receive all of the Indianapolis stations. The best I can do is offer you your money back if you are not satisfied. Sometimes there is no way of knowing for sure without trying.
Regards,
Denny
>
>
Sullivan 47882
>
>>
I examined the reception data and found the EZ-HD TV antenna to be a perfect match for your location. The antenna can be installed in a stationary position with the narrow end of the antenna pointing North/Northwest. This position will provide reception on all of the Indianapolis area stations. To supply 1 TV I doubt you will need an amplifier. However, when you add a signal splitter or if one is already installed I suggest the DA 25 distribution amplifier installed just ahead of the signal splitter on the antenna side.
>
If you have the choice an outside installation is your best option, it always is.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
>
>
Lebanon 46052
>
>
I live northwest of Indianapolis. I have mostly stations in the red, blue and one
violet colored station. I have single story house with some trees 40 ft away as high or a little
taller than the roof top. Would a omni directional antenna be ok? What preamp to use?
I would have 50 ft. of cable with one 4 way splitter in between.
Thanks
Dave M ________
__________ Drive
Lebanon, IN 46052
>
>
Greetings Dave,
>
I examined your reception conditions using two separate sources and hesitate to recommend the MS 2000. This unit does a good job for stations listed on antennaweb in yellow, green, and red but blue becomes hit and miss especially for digital reception.
>
I'm certain your absolute best bet is the
EZ-HD TV antenna. This antenna does amazing things for its size. All of the Indianapolis transmitters are to your Southeast. The antenna can be installed in a fixed position with the narrower end of the antenna pointing SE. There is one station MNT to your East. If you will be using the antenna for digital reception this station should also come in great with the antenna in this position. If your not digitally ready yet the MNT station may not be picture perfect in analog.>
Along with the antenna I suggest the
AP 8780 mast mounted preamplifier. This unit has the amplification needed to supply all 4 TV locations without the need for any additional amplification.
>I am very confident that this equipment properly installed (I'm here to help if you need it) will provide you with excellent reception for both analog and digital/HD signals.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to install the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
>New Harmony 47631
>
>
Denny I live in New Harmony, IN 47631, This is kind of down in a hole, surrounded by some small hills and approximately 25-30 miles from Evansville,IN which I believe has 5-6 HD channels available, looking for an antenna that might work here. I live in town and do have some obstacles such as trees to contend with looking in the Evansville direction, however I do live in an old 2 story house and may be able to get above most of the major obstacles such as other houses and smaller trees from the roof top Thanks in advance, Steve
>
>>
Hi Steve,
>
I examined the reception conditions along with transmitter distances and directions. My recommendation for your location is the Winegard HD 7082P VHF/UHF/DTV TV antenna along with the AP 8700 antenna amplifier. This combination should provide excellent reception from Terre Haute, Bloomington, and Evansville along with a few more. Of course these location are in different directions so rotation of the antenna would be required.
>
UPDATE:
The above recommendation was made about 2 years ago. Since that time the HD Stacker antenna has been designed and is now on the market. My recommendation now would be for the HD Stacker antenna. See the HD Stacker antenna
>
If I can assist you further please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
Denny
TV Antenna Source.
>
>
Washington 47501
>
>I live in Washington Indiana and would like to get Evansville stations.I have a dish network hd system and I am using a Phillips clamp on antenna for the dish but I have a lot of signal loss what kind of antenna would you recommend I don't want to put up a tower and I would like to have a small antenna
>thanks don c
>
>
Greetings Don,
>
The most effective small antenna on the market is the EZ-HD TV antenna. This antenna performs as well as antennas twice its size. Along with the antenna I suggest the AP 8700 mast mounted preamplifier for the absolute best results. To receive the Evansville stations the antenna should be installed with the narrower end of the antenna pointing South.
>
If you would like step by step detailed information on how to =nstall the equipment, or if I can assist you in anyway, please don't hesitate to =ontact me.
>
Best Regards,
Denny Duplessis
TV Antenna Source
"Helping America Watch Free TV"
